PDA

View Full Version : Human -VS- Beast



Matrixman3780
11-05-2006, 08:32 PM
Just wondering every ones opinions here..
keep in mind humans apparently will have extra weapons beasts cannot eventually, and i've heard humans also have higher accuracy and defense than beasts.
on the other hand beasts have more HP and hit higher. They also have nano blast.

MagicianCamille
11-05-2006, 08:58 PM
I like being Human. That way if anybody hits on me I'm pretty sure they aren't into beastiality.

Atrix
11-06-2006, 05:50 AM
I don't know why everyone is so excited about Clair weapons. I used them on the JP PC version and they're not as amazing as everyone here seems to think they'll be. They do hit more creatures than the normal versions of those weapons, but they are so much weaker that I didn't find them that useful.

Beasts have a LOT more ATP and HP than Humans, they also have more DFP despite what you've heard. The nanoblasts aren't that great, but they do come in useful occasionally and are another advantage beasts have over Humans.

Pretty much the only advantage Human Hunters have over Beast Hunters is that you have slightly more ATA. As far as I'm concerned Beasts are the far superior Hunter race - it's not even close. Now, are Cast Hunters better than Beast Hunters? That's a valid question.

LiquidK
11-06-2006, 08:10 AM
I don't know why everyone is so excited about Clair weapons. I used them on the JP PC version and they're not as amazing as everyone here seems to think they'll be. They do hit more creatures than the normal versions of those weapons, but they are so much weaker that I didn't find them that useful.

Beasts have a LOT more ATP and HP than Humans, they also have more DFP despite what you've heard. The nanoblasts aren't that great, but they do come in useful occasionally and are another advantage beasts have over Humans.

Pretty much the only advantage Human Hunters have over Beast Hunters is that you have slightly more ATA. As far as I'm concerned Beasts are the far superior Hunter race - it's not even close. Now, are Cast Hunters better than Beast Hunters? That's a valid question.

If they hit multiple targets, and other weapons don't, aren't they deal more damage then a weapon that doesn't?

Also humans have beasts beat in the Expert Class department.[/b]

Matrixman3780
11-06-2006, 01:18 PM
bump :)

Tsuki Wulf
11-07-2006, 05:06 PM
I don't know why everyone is so excited about Clair weapons. I used them on the JP PC version and they're not as amazing as everyone here seems to think they'll be. They do hit more creatures than the normal versions of those weapons, but they are so much weaker that I didn't find them that useful.

Beasts have a LOT more ATP and HP than Humans, they also have more DFP despite what you've heard. The nanoblasts aren't that great, but they do come in useful occasionally and are another advantage beasts have over Humans.

Pretty much the only advantage Human Hunters have over Beast Hunters is that you have slightly more ATA. As far as I'm concerned Beasts are the far superior Hunter race - it's not even close. Now, are Cast Hunters better than Beast Hunters? That's a valid question.

If they hit multiple targets, and other weapons don't, aren't they deal more damage then a weapon that doesn't?

Also humans have beasts beat in the Expert Class department.[/b]

If you will take the time to rember there is also a expert melee class for anyone who has Hunter rank 10. I'll admit due to are stats we are a little limited to mainly melee combat, but I like geting close and personal with my prey as I slash them open, thanks to playing the story mode my favorit weapon is the Claws, perfect weapon for a beast if you ask me. Also the majority of Beasts I know and have added to my parter card are fellow furrys aka anthro's. Also the Nanoblast if used wisly is very good, boss battle or not, and if used well in PvP (if they add it) it will be a great tool there as well, but sadly there will be many fools using it as well, and lastly humans are not my cup of tea due to there bland stats, not saying they suck, but I would not want to play as one due to my love of melee combat, I would feel weak due to my MUCH lower HP, and damage out put ><, but I will admit they will make better Wartechers, Figunners, Guntechers, etc, then we beasts will. Just rember we make the best Fortefighter, and with us standing infront of a Force (or other form of mage) we can easly keep a party going on.

hawaiian c
11-07-2006, 09:18 PM
i like human ther look kooler and i like to try to look like me well close looking like me lol.. but best lot stronger and it has the nano blast..

ps hay where cast and newman since we on this topic??

Tsuki Wulf
11-07-2006, 09:34 PM
i like human ther look kooler and i like to try to look like me well close looking like me lol.. but best lot stronger and it has the nano blast..

ps hay where cast and newman since we on this topic??

This topic is about Human's VS Beast's, not a "what race is the best of them all" if you want somthing like that then here's your answer, none, each race is better at somthing then another, as the humans are a well rounded race, so they can play as a force, hunter, ranger etc, with the same basic stat avarage. and when it comes to looks I like how the Beasts look more then the humans, specialy love ears 1 and 2 on the beast, ear 3 is meh, and ear four on the females is perfect for a cute look. And please young one take the time to write things properly. And Nanoblast is lots of fun when used wisely, but if used at the wrong time like any good skill it can be a total waste.

hawaiian c
11-07-2006, 09:47 PM
i like human ther look kooler and i like to try to look like me well close looking like me lol.. but best lot stronger and it has the nano blast..

ps hay where cast and newman since we on this topic??

This topic is about Human's VS Beast's, not a "what race is the best of them all" if you want somthing like that then here's your answer, none, each race is better at somthing then another, as the humans are a well rounded race, so they can play as a force, hunter, ranger etc, with the same basic stat avarage. and when it comes to looks I like how the Beasts look more then the humans, specialy love ears 1 and 2 on the beast, ear 3 is meh, and ear four on the females is perfect for a cute look. And please young one take the time to write things properly. And Nanoblast is lots of fun when used wisely, but if used at the wrong time like any good skill it can be a total waste.i know what you mean i seen kids "dont know how they get the time to be lvl 20" but they use it right after the party kills every thing lol.. someone did that and got booted lol

Atrix
11-07-2006, 11:20 PM
I don't know why everyone is so excited about Clair weapons. I used them on the JP PC version and they're not as amazing as everyone here seems to think they'll be. They do hit more creatures than the normal versions of those weapons, but they are so much weaker that I didn't find them that useful.

Beasts have a LOT more ATP and HP than Humans, they also have more DFP despite what you've heard. The nanoblasts aren't that great, but they do come in useful occasionally and are another advantage beasts have over Humans.

Pretty much the only advantage Human Hunters have over Beast Hunters is that you have slightly more ATA. As far as I'm concerned Beasts are the far superior Hunter race - it's not even close. Now, are Cast Hunters better than Beast Hunters? That's a valid question.

If they hit multiple targets, and other weapons don't, aren't they deal more damage then a weapon that doesn't?

Also humans have beasts beat in the Expert Class department.[/b]

They also have smaller blade lengths than the normal weapons too, so it's not that often that they actually hit more than one. I'd much rather have the standard weapons doing far more damage per hit. Most of the time the only creatures you need to worry about are the big ones anyway.

Expert classes have absolutely no bearing on this conversation since the topic is about which race makes the better Hunter - IMO there is no doubt that Beasts are far better suited to that particular class.

If you want to talk about Humans Vs Beasts in general, then Humans are good if you can't decide what class you actually want to be or if you want to use one of the (physically weaker) hybrid classes. Beasts, however, are good if you're intending to be a Fortefighter, which is the natural extension of playing a pure HU character. They're also pretty good as a wartecher if you intend only using your techs for Resta, Regene, Reverser and the buffs.