Are you kidding me.

[mr.poodles]

Tae Kim
to me

show details 5:11 PM (44 minutes ago)


Reply

Follow up message

Hello Nick. I will not be rewriting the review, sorry. My review will stand. As for your issue, I never directly compared the Conduit to Goldeneye. My point was that the graphical leap from Goldeneye to the Conduit was not as impressive as the jump from the Xbox to the 360 or the PS2 to the PS3. I could attach screenshots comparing the original Halo to Halo 3 and the original Killzone to Killzone 2 and you'd clearly see that the graphics are much more impressive. That was my point.

-tae



That is what I got as a reply from the guy who wrote the gamepro review. Wow.

[Zirco]

Wow, that guy is low...

[HiroLord]

...

He's unprofession in everything he does, apparently.

[mr.poodles]

See, I consider the similarity to Goldeneye as both a positive and a negative. Sure, it's great to finally have a shooter that spiritually follows in the footsteps of a great game you played in the past (it also reminded me of Perfect Dark, to boot), but damn, the N64 was two generations ago -- what does it say about the Wii that The Conduit doesn't blow Goldeneye's graphics out of the water the way Halo 3 outshines the original Halo or Killzone 2 completely destroys the original Killzone?


That is from his review.

[cokobudder]

he said the EXACT same thing to me...

[koroluigi]

mass messaging.experts lose the meaning of reviewing when it comes to money

[Methusaleh]

This is the first time Gamepro has been relevant in 10 years. Suddenly they are in the headlines again. They are loving this.