zerosum
12-02-2010, 09:29 PM
I have not attacked another player yet (or defended). But I'm starting to think about territory strategy.
Let's say player "A" has a castle and a string of five single territories with no other territories.
[C12345]
If player "B" takes territory "3", does player "A" lose control of territory 4 and 5? I assume yes.
Now let's say player "A" has a castle, a string of five single territories and a Fort
with no other territories
[C12345F]
If player "B" takes territory "3", does player "A" lose control of territory 4, 5 and the Fort? Again, I assume yes. Would be extreamly damaging assuming the Fort then automatically reverts to a wild territory.
So it is probably important to have more than one "string" of territories connecting other important territories.
Let's say player "A" has a castle and a string of five single territories with no other territories.
[C12345]
If player "B" takes territory "3", does player "A" lose control of territory 4 and 5? I assume yes.
Now let's say player "A" has a castle, a string of five single territories and a Fort
with no other territories
[C12345F]
If player "B" takes territory "3", does player "A" lose control of territory 4, 5 and the Fort? Again, I assume yes. Would be extreamly damaging assuming the Fort then automatically reverts to a wild territory.
So it is probably important to have more than one "string" of territories connecting other important territories.